See the full
PwC GMA financial report here [pdf].
An analysis of the
financial performance of CPG companies alongside sustainability reporting shows
companies that report have stronger financial results. Disclosure on
sustainability, particularly greenhouse gas emissions, continues to spread
through the corporate world, and the information flow—whether through Bloomberg
terminals, supplier sustainability scorecards, or annual reports—keeps growing.
In 2010, 70% of S&P 500 companies submitted voluntary disclosures to the
Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP),up from 56% in 2007.
Of interest in the article: PwC looked at the
financial performance of CPG companies that produced sustainability reporting,
versus those that didn’t – and concluded that sustainability reporting
companies were on average, more successful than their counterparts
- Reporting companies had a high gross
margin
- Reporting companies had a high median
SG&A spending as a percent of sales
- Reporting companies had a higher free
cash flow to sales performance
- Reporting companies had a higher return
on sales
The caveat with all of this is, of course, that
correlation doesn’t necessarily equal causation.
- Are reporting companies more successful
because they report, or,
- Are successful companies reporting more
because they have the luxury to do so; value transparency and sustainability
reporting; and the capability that makes them a success financially, also makes
it easier for them to produce sustainability reports (as the measuring just ain’t
easy)
I’m willing to bet on the second bullet.